Ranitidine Cancer Risk Found Only By Litigation Plaintiffs’ ‘Unreliable’ Research, Judge Rules

 Plaintiffs in Multi-District Litigation didn’t provide scientific evidence of OTC heartburn drug Zantac increasing risk of cancer. Federal judge says plaintiffs' research showed “a lack of substantiation for analytical leaps” in alleging dangerously high levels of NDMA in ranitidine drugs.

• Source: Shutterstock

The initial research sparking concern about a potential link between heartburn drug ranitidine and cancer and additional studies noted in thousands of complaints for damages from manufacturers were faulty and unreliable, a federal judge says.

In US District Court for Southern District of Florida, Judge Robin Rosenberg in a summary judgement dismissed all Multi-District Litigation...

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on HBW Insight for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Legal

Xlear Lawsuit Argues To Shelve FTC Policy For Health Claim Substantiation Under Loper Bright

 

Complaint filed Utah federal court says “Supreme Court explicitly rejected Chevron deference to agency interpretations” in the Loper decision, compelling rejection of “an agency’s statutory interpretation unless the court, ‘after applying all relevant interpretive tools, concludes’ the interpretatio

Loper Bright ‘Might Not Be Cataclysmic’ With FDA’s ‘Good Reputation’ For Science – Attorney

 

Bridget Dooling, law school professor who reviewed draft regulations from FDA and other agencies as OMB attorney, says history of federal court decisions in litigation challenging FDA’s interpretation of statutes points to judges typically defer to agency decisions based in science.

Supreme Court 1935 Ruling Limiting Executive Authority On Appointments ‘Unravels’ Today – DoJ

 

In complaint and response to motion to dismiss, Rebecca Kelly Slaughter’s and Alvaro Bedoya’s attorneys elaborate on Supreme Court ‘s 1935 decision, Humphrey’s Executor v. US. Administration attorneys, though, contend the ruling isn’t relevant to the current FTC.

Congress, Researchers Highlight Security Risks At DNA Testing Services

 
• By 

Congress launched an inquiry into 23andMe amid privacy concerns following its bankruptcy, particularly regarding the potential sale of sensitive user data. Additionally, a Cybernews report gave 40 DNA testing firms an average cybersecurity grade of D, citing widespread vulnerabilities and data breaches, along with inadequate public information about their security practices.

More from Policy & Regulation

People On The Move: Appointments At Pharma Deutschland, AMA, FSA

 
• By 

A round-up of the latest people moves: Pharma Deutschland names head of new OTC Market division; the African Medicines Agency appoints director general; the UK's Food Standards Agency adds members to novel foods committee.

Haleon Study: Self-Care Policies Could Save Finland €60m Per Year

 
• By 

Creating a working group to drive Rx-to-OTC switch is one of the ways in which Finland could expand self-care and save €60m per year for the country's health system, suggests a recently published report commissioned by Haleon.

PAGB: UK Gov Must Invest In Self-Care To Realize ‘Untapped Potential’

 
• By 

Reacting to chancellor Rachel Reeves' 2025 public spending review, PAGB welcomed increased funding for healthcare and life sciences while stressing the need to promote self-care practices.