1. HBW Insight
  2. >>Health
  3. >>Policy & Regulation
  4. >>Legal

Chevron’s Fall Strengthens Industry’s Hand In Disagreements With US FDA, But May Spur Delays

 
• By Sue Sutter

Firms can be more forceful in disputes with FDA now that Supreme Court has eliminated Chevron deference. Questions around whether an evidentiary standard has been met may be ripe for challenge, legal experts said, but they also caution that sponsors will face more uncertainty.

Produce
What types of FDA disputes are ripe for litigation in a post-Chevron world? • Source: Shutterstock

[Editor’s note: This story appeared first in our sister publication, Pink Sheet.]

Biopharma companies that have a prelitigation dispute with the US Food and Drug Administration will be in a stronger position...

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on HBW Insight for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required
Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber?

More from Legal

‘Classic Economic Injury’ Merits Plaintiffs’ Standing In Challenge To US FDA Homeopathic Regulation

 
• By Malcolm Spicer

Attorney Jonathan Emord says federal court’s grant of standing for Alliance for Natural Health USA and Meditrend to challenge FDA’s safety concerns about homeopathic drugs leaves open a door to continue arguing the agency violated multiple regulations by imposing NDA requirements for homeopathics.

Xlear Lawsuit Argues To Shelve FTC Policy For Health Claim Substantiation Under Loper Bright

 
• By Malcolm Spicer

Complaint filed Utah federal court says “Supreme Court explicitly rejected Chevron deference to agency interpretations” in the Loper decision, compelling rejection of “an agency’s statutory interpretation unless the court, ‘after applying all relevant interpretive tools, concludes’ the interpretatio

Loper Bright ‘Might Not Be Cataclysmic’ With FDA’s ‘Good Reputation’ For Science – Attorney

 
• By Malcolm Spicer

Bridget Dooling, law school professor who reviewed draft regulations from FDA and other agencies as OMB attorney, says history of federal court decisions in litigation challenging FDA’s interpretation of statutes points to judges typically defer to agency decisions based in science.

Supreme Court 1935 Ruling Limiting Executive Authority On Appointments ‘Unravels’ Today – DoJ

 
• By Malcolm Spicer

In complaint and response to motion to dismiss, Rebecca Kelly Slaughter’s and Alvaro Bedoya’s attorneys elaborate on Supreme Court ‘s 1935 decision, Humphrey’s Executor v. US. Administration attorneys, though, contend the ruling isn’t relevant to the current FTC.

More from Pink Sheet

Japan To Cut Leqembi Price By 15% Following Cost Effectiveness Review

 
• By Lisa Takagi

While the government announces eight to 15% cuts to the four products, industry groups urges for its operational improvement without expansion.

Precigen’s Papzimeous Approval Allows US FDA CBER Director To Emphasize Flexibility

 
• By Bridget Silverman

Returning FDA biologics center director Vinay Prasad used the Papzimeous approval announcement to reinforce his flexibility on rare disease therapies after several complete response letters and his brief departure from the agency.

Generic Drug Industry Seeks More US FDA Communication Reforms In GDUFA Renewal

 
• By Sue Sutter

Enhancing the consistency and clarity of information requests and discipline review letters, and improving assessment milestone communications are key areas targeted by generic drug makers for user fee program negotiations.