Landmark EU Ruling: Animal-Tested Cosmetic Ingredients Not Banned Per Se

Firms cannot use safety data derived from third-country animal testing to substantiate product safety in accordance with the European Cosmetics Regulation, but such testing does not in itself constitute a violation of the EU’s animal-testing ban. It may be more challenging to compile required safety-assessment reports, but companies don’t necessarily have to choose between the EU and emerging markets such as China.

rat trapped in a cage

The European Union’s highest court has decided that cosmetic products marketed in the European Union can contain ingredients tested on animals to meet third-country regulatory requirements, but that data cannot be used to substantiate safety as required by the European Cosmetics Regulation.

More from Legal

Uncertainty Abounds With SEC Climate Reporting Rule Tied Up In Courts

 
• By 

Despite questions surrounding the SEC rule, including disputes being litigated in the US Eighth Circuit, companies must prepare to meet the new climate disclosure requirements in addition to related mandates in California and abroad. Experts emphasize opportunities beyond compliance.

In Emergency Rule, California Bans All THCs In Hemp Products: Industry Asks, Where’s The Fire?

 

California authorities say predominance of retailers licensed to sell hemp are compliant with ban published effective on 3 October through emergency regulation. But hemp industry’s contesting the regulation in state court, arguing state authorities inappropriately used emergency action to change state law on hemp products legislature passed in 2021.

J&J Sued For ‘Plant-Based’ Claims On Aveeno, Neutrogena Makeup Removing Wipes

 
• By 

Plaintiffs in California federal courts seek restitution, damages, and other relief on behalf of themselves and consumers nationwide, whom allegedly were deceived by “Plant-Based” representations on Aveeno and Neutrogena Makeup Removing Wipes.

US FDA Action On Benzene Levels In Acne Products Demanded By New Citizen Petition

 
• By 

Filed on 20 August by Pensacola, FL-based law firm Aylstock, Witkin, Kreis & Overholtz (AWKO) on behalf of an unnamed client, the petition points to benzene study data unconnected to Valisure on unheated benzoyl peroxide products, but is light on details of how it was conducted.

More from Policy & Regulation

CIR Panel Finds Two Hair Dye Ingredients Safe, But Not For Skin, Eyes Or Lashes

 
• By 

Data from the US Food and Drug Administration indicated that two hair dye ingredients are formulated in eye makeup and dermal application products, prompting a Cosmetic Ingredient Review panel to conclude one dye is unsafe for such uses and discouraging those uses in the other dye.

No Longer Voluntary, MoCRA Drives Drastic Increase In Registered Companies, Products

 
• By 

Preliminary registration data released by FDA offers a first glimpse of the Modernization of Cosmetics Regulation Act’s impact on information the agency has at hand.

Beauty Counterfeit Market Continues Surging On Fast-Evolving Criminal Rings

 
• By 

Counterfeit beauty products cost the US industry an estimated $3bn in 2023, says a trade expert during the Personal Care Products Council’s Beauty Collective Summit.