1. HBW Insight
  2. >>Beauty
  3. >>Policy & Regulation
  4. >>Legal

Landmark EU Ruling: Animal-Tested Cosmetic Ingredients Not Banned Per Se

 
• By Ryan Nelson

Firms cannot use safety data derived from third-country animal testing to substantiate product safety in accordance with the European Cosmetics Regulation, but such testing does not in itself constitute a violation of the EU’s animal-testing ban. It may be more challenging to compile required safety-assessment reports, but companies don’t necessarily have to choose between the EU and emerging markets such as China.

rat trapped in a cage

The European Union’s highest court has decided that cosmetic products marketed in the European Union can contain ingredients tested on animals to meet third-country regulatory requirements, but that data cannot be used to substantiate safety as required by the European Cosmetics Regulation.

Overall, this is good news for industry. Questions have been raised as to whether the EU’s cosmetic animal-testing ban is...

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on HBW Insight for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required
Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber?

More from Legal

‘Off-Label’ Beauty Hacks: Navigating the Risks of Consumer-Driven Innovation

 
• By Rachel Raphael, Elizabeth Bresnahan and Kathryn Ignash

Guest authors Rachel Raphael, partner at Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP and associates at the firm, Elizabeth Bresnahan and Kathryn Ignash, advise beauty companies on how to navigate the legal risks associated with consumers ‘off-label’ beauty hacks.

Supreme Court 1935 Ruling Limiting Executive Authority On Appointments ‘Unravels’ Today – DoJ

 
• By Malcolm Spicer

In complaint and response to motion to dismiss, Rebecca Kelly Slaughter’s and Alvaro Bedoya’s attorneys elaborate on Supreme Court ‘s 1935 decision, Humphrey’s Executor v. US. Administration attorneys, though, contend the ruling isn’t relevant to the current FTC.

Estee Lauder Faces Securities Fraud Suit After District Court Denies Motion To Dismiss

 
• By Eileen Francis

A federal judge in the Southern District of New York denied Estee Lauder’s motion to dismiss a securities fraud lawsuit filed by shareholders who said the company concealed its reliance on a gray market retail revenue stream, which ultimately caused sales and the stock price to plunge.

Uncertainty Abounds With SEC Climate Reporting Rule Tied Up In Courts

 
• By Lauren Nardella

Despite questions surrounding the SEC rule, including disputes being litigated in the US Eighth Circuit, companies must prepare to meet the new climate disclosure requirements in addition to related mandates in California and abroad. Experts emphasize opportunities beyond compliance.

More from Policy & Regulation

EU Green Claims Directive: Commission Says It ‘Has Not Withdrawn’ From Negotiations

 
• By David Ridley

What's going on with the EU Green Claims Directive? HBW Insight speaks to the European Commission, Parliament and Council to find out why trilogue negotiations seem to have stalled.

Senate Appropriators Give US FDA More Non-User Fee Funds Than House

 
• By Sarah Karlin-Smith

FDA would receive more funding for fiscal year 2026 in the Senate appropriations bill than its House counterpart, including $10m for unannounced foreign inspections.

US FDA: No Replacement Yet For Animal Methods In Testing Systemic Effects Of Sunscreens

 
• By Lauren Nardella

While FDA fully supports the recent roadmap to reduce and eliminate animal testing, animal tests are still necessary for assessing systemic effects, says Jacqueline Corrigan-Curay, acting director for CDER, during a House Energy and Commerce Health Subcommittee hearing.