Proposed changes to California’s Prop 65 would increase the difficulty for showing that exposure from a product to carcinogenic chemicals or reproductive toxins is within a threshold that exempts it from a label warning requirement, says food and drug attorneyGeorge Gigounas.
The proposal would impact how dietary supplement and food manufacturers and other firms including cosmetic and personal care product marketers test samples of products and how they calculate the “average”...
Read the full article – start your free trial today!
Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on HBW Insight for daily insights
- Start your 7-day free trial
- Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
- Access comprehensive global coverage
- Enjoy instant access – no credit card required
Already a subscriber?