The leading consumer goods retailer in Denmark, Coop Danmark A/S, announced March 9 that it will no longer be purchasing cosmetic products containing per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), including from international brands, due to concerns about cancer, endocrine disruption and other health risks linked to the ingredient group. (Also see "Personal-Care Ingredient News In Brief: UC Berkeley Study Makes Waves; PFAS In Cosmetics; More" - HBW Insight, 11 December, 2018.) “We have a great focus on protecting our customers from exposure to chemical substances that can contribute to a harmful cocktail effect. By taking the lead, we hope that the entire international beauty industry can be encouraged to find better alternatives,” says Coop Quality Manager Malene Teller Blume. The decision, effective immediately, means that PFAS-containing cosmetics will vanish by mid-September from coop.dk and Coop retail chains – including Kvickly, SuperBrugsen, Dagli’Brugsen and subsidiaries fakta A/S and Irma A/S – which in sum account for 1,050 stores across Denmark and DKK 50bn in annual turnover, according to the release.
Danish Retail Group Blacklists Cosmetics With PFAS; Australian Animal-Testing Ban; More Cosmetics News
Cosmetics containing fluorinated compounds are no longer welcome in Coop Denmark’s 1,050 stores or its e-commerce platform. Meanwhile, consumer group BEUC proposes changes to the European Cosmetics Regulation to address endocrine-disrupting chemicals, and Australia passes legislation to bar new, cosmetics-only chemicals from market if their safety substantiation relies on animal testing.
More from Regulation
Fragrance Creators Association will push the Trump Administration to exclude from tariffs fragrance materials that cannot be produced or cultivated domestically, while both FCA and the Personal Care Products Council will continue to promote the economic benefits of their respective industries.
Single-use packaging producers subject to Oregon state’s Extended Producer Responsibility law that didn’t meet the 31 March deadline to report their packaging materials are given a grace period to report until 30 April, says Circular Action Alliance, the organization carrying out the EPR program.
Reclassifying ethanol as a carcinogenic, mutagenic, or reprotoxic substance - something the European Chemicals Agency seems likely to do in the near future - would be “tantamount to a de facto ban” with “fatal consequences” for medical care in Germany, says Pharma Deutschland in a joint paper with 13 other German healthcare industry associations.
Personal care companies selling in California that suspect they are subject to its listing of a common stabilizer and packaging material should collect Certificates of Analysis for all raw materials, pursue third-party formula testing and retain counsel.
More from Policy & Regulation
Single-use packaging producers subject to California’s SB 54 recycling law, which implements a statewide EPR plan, should continue to prepare for its implementation, even as they enter a ‘prolonged period of uncertainty,’ says consultant Michael Washburn.
Data from the US Food and Drug Administration indicated that two hair dye ingredients are formulated in eye makeup and dermal application products, prompting a Cosmetic Ingredient Review panel to conclude one dye is unsafe for such uses and discouraging those uses in the other dye.
Preliminary registration data released by FDA offers a first glimpse of the Modernization of Cosmetics Regulation Act’s impact on information the agency has at hand.