Sabinsa Reaches Out To US Regulators To Squeeze Fake Vitamin C Out Of Ingredient Markets

Sabinsa provided FDA and FTC with documentation of “an ingredient falsely marketed and sold as vitamin C derived from amla fruit (Emblica officinalis), which two independent labs have confirmed is actually derived from corn, sugarcane or other plants.”

Nutritional and cosmetic ingredient developer Sabinsa Corp. is turning to US regulatory agencies to pick up its hunt for dietary and food ingredients falsely labeled or advertised as vitamin C equivalents.

Sabinsa on 30 November announced it has provided the Food and Drug Administration and the Federal Trade Commission with documentation...

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on HBW Insight for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Legal

FDA RIF Delays Response On NPA NMN Petition

 

Due to staff reductions at FDA ordered by DOGE, but accounting for return of some employees after their dismissals were rescinded, agency missed July 31 deadline it had set for responding to the NPA’s petition and expects to respond by Sept. 30.

NAD Asks FTC To Pull Bandage Off Firm’s Plan To Exhaust Inventory Using ‘2X Faster Healing’ Claim

 

After National Advertising Division attorneys, in a review prompted by a challenge by Band-Aid line marketer Kenvue, recommended ASO LLV cease use of its “up to 2x faster healing” claim, they determined the firm had not fully complied.

Supreme Court 1935 Ruling Limiting Executive Authority On Appointments ‘Unravels’ Today – DoJ

 

In complaint and response to motion to dismiss, Rebecca Kelly Slaughter’s and Alvaro Bedoya’s attorneys elaborate on Supreme Court ‘s 1935 decision, Humphrey’s Executor v. US. Administration attorneys, though, contend the ruling isn’t relevant to the current FTC.

Loper Bright Could Trip FDA On Self-Affirmed GRAS

 

Instead of arguing FDA’s not authorized to offer option under authority from 1958 Food Additives Amendments, potential litigation could contend the law requires agency to continue making self-GRAS without notification available.

More from Policy & Regulation

EU Green Claims Directive: Commission Says It ‘Has Not Withdrawn’ From Negotiations

 
• By 

What's going on with the EU Green Claims Directive? HBW Insight speaks to the European Commission, Parliament and Council to find out why trilogue negotiations seem to have stalled.

US FDA Extracts More Evidence To Ban Kratom

 

Recent warning letters to seven companies marketing products with kratom extract known as 7-OH are FDA’s first in three years referencing unlawful products containing kratom and the first of all its kratom-related warnings to reference extracts from the botanical.

HHS Wants Employees (And Public?) To Report Diversity, Equity And Inclusion Discrimination

 
• By 

A survey asks FDA staff to disclose whether DEI policies caused discrimination or resulted in disciplinary action against career employees over the past five years, but uses a web form that the general public also can access.