Congress Likely To Legislate Monetary Penalty Authority In FTC Enforcement If SCOTUS Strikes It

White House, Democrat majority in Congress and likely next FTC chair support the agency wielding the authority, says advertising law attorney Holly Melton. Supreme Court, though, likely will rule in pending cases that a strict reading of an FTC regulation doesn’t grant monetary penalty authority.

Monetary penalties the US Federal Trade Commission imposes in its enforcement against false advertising is an authority the Supreme Court isn’t likely to uphold but that has support from the White House and the majority party in Congress.

The authority, says advertising law attorney Holly Melton, also is supported by the FTC’s next likely chair. As well, the...

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on HBW Insight for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Legal

FDA RIF Delays Response On NPA NMN Petition

 

Due to staff reductions at FDA ordered by DOGE, but accounting for return of some employees after their dismissals were rescinded, agency missed July 31 deadline it had set for responding to the NPA’s petition and expects to respond by Sept. 30.

NAD Asks FTC To Pull Bandage Off Firm’s Plan To Exhaust Inventory Using ‘2X Faster Healing’ Claim

 

After National Advertising Division attorneys, in a review prompted by a challenge by Band-Aid line marketer Kenvue, recommended ASO LLV cease use of its “up to 2x faster healing” claim, they determined the firm had not fully complied.

Supreme Court 1935 Ruling Limiting Executive Authority On Appointments ‘Unravels’ Today – DoJ

 

In complaint and response to motion to dismiss, Rebecca Kelly Slaughter’s and Alvaro Bedoya’s attorneys elaborate on Supreme Court ‘s 1935 decision, Humphrey’s Executor v. US. Administration attorneys, though, contend the ruling isn’t relevant to the current FTC.

Loper Bright Could Trip FDA On Self-Affirmed GRAS

 

Instead of arguing FDA’s not authorized to offer option under authority from 1958 Food Additives Amendments, potential litigation could contend the law requires agency to continue making self-GRAS without notification available.

More from Policy & Regulation

HHS Wants Employees (And Public?) To Report Diversity, Equity And Inclusion Discrimination

 
• By 

A survey asks FDA staff to disclose whether DEI policies caused discrimination or resulted in disciplinary action against career employees over the past five years, but uses a web form that the general public also can access.

Cloudy Tariff Conditions Expected To Linger In US

 

White House announces president extends deadline he set in April for other countries to make new tariff deals from July 9 to Aug. 1, when the administration will start sending letters warning other countries that higher tariffs could take effect.

US FDA’s Tough Talk On Talc: Regulating In An Echo Chamber

 

An FDA “expert roundtable” on talc produced a new talking point on a potential drug safety risk, but the basis of that claim is difficult to determine.