Sephora Asks NY Federal Court To Toss Out ‘Clean at Sephora’ False Advertising Suit

The beauty retailer moves to dismiss a putative class action targeting its ‘Clean at Sephora’ designation for products sold on its website, maintaining its program is a model of transparency. Allowing the case to move forward would “leave no word safe from linguistic manipulation,” Sephora says.

Sephora USA Inc. is asking New York’s Northern District to dismiss a consumer fraud lawsuit concerning its “Clean at Sephora” designation, arguing the case relies on “linguistic manipulation” of the phrase when in reality the retailer clearly and prominently explains its meaning to consumers.

In the motion to dismiss filed 2 February, Sephora counsel Jonathan Lupkin of Lupkin PLLC and Robert Shapiro of Barack Ferrazzano Kirschbaum & Nagelberg LLP maintain the “Clean at Sephora” program is a model of transparency that

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on HBW Insight for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Legal

Supreme Court 1935 Ruling Limiting Executive Authority On Appointments ‘Unravels’ Today – DoJ

 

In complaint and response to motion to dismiss, Rebecca Kelly Slaughter’s and Alvaro Bedoya’s attorneys elaborate on Supreme Court ‘s 1935 decision, Humphrey’s Executor v. US. Administration attorneys, though, contend the ruling isn’t relevant to the current FTC.

Estee Lauder Faces Securities Fraud Suit After District Court Denies Motion To Dismiss

 

A federal judge in the Southern District of New York denied Estee Lauder’s motion to dismiss a securities fraud lawsuit filed by shareholders who said the company concealed its reliance on a gray market retail revenue stream, which ultimately caused sales and the stock price to plunge.

Uncertainty Abounds With SEC Climate Reporting Rule Tied Up In Courts

 
• By 

Despite questions surrounding the SEC rule, including disputes being litigated in the US Eighth Circuit, companies must prepare to meet the new climate disclosure requirements in addition to related mandates in California and abroad. Experts emphasize opportunities beyond compliance.

In Emergency Rule, California Bans All THCs In Hemp Products: Industry Asks, Where’s The Fire?

 

California authorities say predominance of retailers licensed to sell hemp are compliant with ban published effective on 3 October through emergency regulation. But hemp industry’s contesting the regulation in state court, arguing state authorities inappropriately used emergency action to change state law on hemp products legislature passed in 2021.

More from Policy & Regulation