US Ninth Circuit On Glyphosate Prop 65 Listing Could Have Big Implications For TiO2 And Beyond

Industry complaints about California’s Prop 65 program are nothing new, but First Amendment cases against the state’s attorney general currently moving through California federal courts could have novel, outsized impacts. The Personal Care Products Council, which is suing over a titanium dioxide listing, awaits a review of glyphosate litigation pending in the Ninth Circuit.

(Shutterstock)

A coming US Ninth Circuit decision could clear a path for the Personal Care Products Council’s suit against California in a Prop 65 dispute over titanium dioxide.

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on HBW Insight for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Legal

EU Probiotics Deadlock: Ombudsman Finds ‘No Maladministration’ By The Commission

 
• By 

In response to an IPA Europe complaint, European Ombudsman Emily O’Reilly finds that the Commission’s interpretation of EU food legislation in relation to probiotics is “reasonable and in line with the main goal of this legislation, which is to ensure a high level of consumer protection.”

Uncertainty Abounds With SEC Climate Reporting Rule Tied Up In Courts

 
• By 

Despite questions surrounding the SEC rule, including disputes being litigated in the US Eighth Circuit, companies must prepare to meet the new climate disclosure requirements in addition to related mandates in California and abroad. Experts emphasize opportunities beyond compliance.

Dietary Supplements Category Ranks Second For Food Fraud In EU

 
• By 

Report from European Commission's Alert and Cooperation Network finds EU consumers are being deceived by companies marketing supplements making unauthorized health claims and containing unapproved ingredients. 

Deference No More: More Challenges Against US FDA After Supreme Court Tosses Chevron Doctrine?

 
• By 

The Supreme Court’s 6-3 ruling is expected to have a minimal impact on drug approvals and other scientific determinations, but matters steeped in the interpretation of regulation and statute, such as marketing exclusivity, could face a heightened risk of challenge, legal experts say.

More from Policy & Regulation

State Actions, Proposals On Food Additive Bans Reflect Interest In Aligning With RFK Jr.’s View

 

Changes established in West Virginia and proposed in numerous other states gained momentum after Trump was elected to his second term as president and nominated Kennedy to head HHS.

Some New Tools, More Old For Supplement Sector Enforcement During Trump’s Second Term

 

Tariffs on imports from China and look at eliminating self-affirmed GRAS pathway introduced under Trump while DoJ Consumer Protection Branch also continues supplement sector priorities enduring across administrations.

Availability Of Counterfeit Supplements Ringing Up Impact On Brand Sales And Consumer Safety

 

Sales of Bioventra’s probiotic put inventory at “a critical low” as “parallel rise in unverified listings on third-party marketplaces prompted concern among” customers. DoJ and food and drug industry attorney say counterfeiting remains a problem in supplement sector.