1. HBW Insight
  2. >>Beauty
  3. >>Policy & Regulation
  4. >>Legal

Hair-Relaxer Litigation May Proceed In Illinois Federal Court, Judge Rules

 
• By Ryan Nelson

US district judge Mary Rowland decided not to throw out the majority of plaintiffs’ claims against L’Oreal, Revlon, SoftSheen-Carson and other hair-relaxer marketers on 13 November. She says plaintiffs have sufficiently pleaded at this stage that defendants’ negligence resulted in their unknowingly using toxic chemical straightening products on their hair, leading to cancers or other injuries.

• Source: Shutterstock

Consolidated multidistrict litigation will go forward in Illinois’ Northern District alleging that L’Oreal USA, Inc., Revlon, Inc., SoftSheen-Carson, LLC, Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. and a host of other companies were negligent in developing, advertising and selling hair relaxers to consumers without providing warning about their risks.

As a result, the plaintiffs allege to have developed cancer and other injuries.

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on HBW Insight for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required
Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber?

More from Legal

Producers Sue Oregon Over ‘Crushing’ EPR Recycling Law, Call It Unconstitutional

 
• By Eileen Francis

A national wholesalers’ trade group is suing Oregon, claiming its EPR law, which requires producers to register, report packaging data and pay fees, is unconstitutional and overly burdensome.

‘Off-Label’ Beauty Hacks: Navigating the Risks of Consumer-Driven Innovation

 
• By Rachel Raphael, Elizabeth Bresnahan and Kathryn Ignash

Guest authors Rachel Raphael, partner at Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP and associates at the firm, Elizabeth Bresnahan and Kathryn Ignash, advise beauty companies on how to navigate the legal risks associated with consumers ‘off-label’ beauty hacks.

Supreme Court 1935 Ruling Limiting Executive Authority On Appointments ‘Unravels’ Today – DoJ

 
• By Malcolm Spicer

In complaint and response to motion to dismiss, Rebecca Kelly Slaughter’s and Alvaro Bedoya’s attorneys elaborate on Supreme Court ‘s 1935 decision, Humphrey’s Executor v. US. Administration attorneys, though, contend the ruling isn’t relevant to the current FTC.

Estee Lauder Faces Securities Fraud Suit After District Court Denies Motion To Dismiss

 
• By Eileen Francis

A federal judge in the Southern District of New York denied Estee Lauder’s motion to dismiss a securities fraud lawsuit filed by shareholders who said the company concealed its reliance on a gray market retail revenue stream, which ultimately caused sales and the stock price to plunge.

More from Policy & Regulation

Unanimous Support Across House Energy And Commerce To Reauthorize FDA’s OMUFA Program

 
• By Malcolm Spicer

Committee voted 51-0 to approve five-year authorization of FDA program user fee program needed to support regulatory pathway for large majority of nonprescription drugs available in the US with amendment to expand stakeholder engagement with FDA.

US Tariff Exemption For Indonesian Materials Not Produced Domestically A Boon For Fragrance – FCA

 
• By Eileen Francis

The Fragrance Creators Association President & CEO Farah Ahmed commends the Trump Administration for exempting from tariffs Indonesian goods not naturally available or produced in the US, which recognizes the “essential” role of fragrance and essential oils.

EU Green Claims Directive: Commission Says It ‘Has Not Withdrawn’ From Negotiations

 
• By David Ridley

What's going on with the EU Green Claims Directive? HBW Insight speaks to the European Commission, Parliament and Council to find out why trilogue negotiations seem to have stalled.