L’Oreal Joins J&J And Major Retailers Defending Benzene Class Actions In Federal Courts

Benzoyl peroxide-based acne drug products and their alleged proclivity to become contaminated with carcinogenic benzene are at the center of putative class actions filing against L’Oreal in federal courts around the US.

• Source: Shutterstock

L’Oreal USA, Inc. faces multiple class action complaints in US federal courts regarding its marketing of benzoyl peroxide (BPO) acne treatment drug products alleging containing benzene.

“Before being sold to the public, the [BPO] Products must be made in conformity with current good manufacturing practices and...

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on HBW Insight for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Legal

‘Classic Economic Injury’ Merits Plaintiffs’ Standing In Challenge To US FDA Homeopathic Regulation

 

Attorney Jonathan Emord says federal court’s grant of standing for Alliance for Natural Health USA and Meditrend to challenge FDA’s safety concerns about homeopathic drugs leaves open a door to continue arguing the agency violated multiple regulations by imposing NDA requirements for homeopathics.

Xlear Lawsuit Argues To Shelve FTC Policy For Health Claim Substantiation Under Loper Bright

 

Complaint filed Utah federal court says “Supreme Court explicitly rejected Chevron deference to agency interpretations” in the Loper decision, compelling rejection of “an agency’s statutory interpretation unless the court, ‘after applying all relevant interpretive tools, concludes’ the interpretatio

Loper Bright ‘Might Not Be Cataclysmic’ With FDA’s ‘Good Reputation’ For Science – Attorney

 

Bridget Dooling, law school professor who reviewed draft regulations from FDA and other agencies as OMB attorney, says history of federal court decisions in litigation challenging FDA’s interpretation of statutes points to judges typically defer to agency decisions based in science.

Supreme Court 1935 Ruling Limiting Executive Authority On Appointments ‘Unravels’ Today – DoJ

 

In complaint and response to motion to dismiss, Rebecca Kelly Slaughter’s and Alvaro Bedoya’s attorneys elaborate on Supreme Court ‘s 1935 decision, Humphrey’s Executor v. US. Administration attorneys, though, contend the ruling isn’t relevant to the current FTC.

More from Policy & Regulation

Senate HELP Committee Adds Sunscreen Regulation Overhaul To OMUFA Reauthorization

 
• By 

OMUFA reauthorization bill including amendment with sunscreen regulation provisions passed by Senate committee, which also approved other provisions not included in House OMUFA bill.

Urban Wastewater Directive: AESGP Requests Intervention In EFPIA’s Legal Action

 
• By 

AESGP has formally submitted a request to the General Court of the European Union to intervene in the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Association’s legal action against the revised EU Urban Wastewater Directive.

Sunscreen Regulation Reforms Still Could Hitch Ride On Senate OMUFA Reauthorization Bill

As stakeholders and lawmakers pin their hopes on OMUFA reauthorization as a vehicle for enacting sunscreen regulatory changes, Senate version of the bill could be the ticket after a sunscreen-specific amendment withdrawn in the House.