Australian Oral-Care Marketer Referred To FTC For Failures In Two NAD Challenges

HiSmile, which is appealing a National Advertising Division case decision arguing that online advertising’s global footprint demands evaluation of ad claims by international standards, has been referred to the FTC for declining to participate or comply in recent NAD cases brought forward by Oral Essentials and Procter & Gamble.

ftc BUILDING
• Source: Shutterstock

Australian oral-care company HiSmile PTY, a critic of the National Advertising Review process that has called for international alignment in advertising self-regulatory practices, has been referred to the Federal Trade Commission in two separate NAD cases.

First, the marketer of tooth concealers and tooth whitening products containing active ingredient phthalimidoperoxycaproic acid (PAP) declined to provide an advertiser statement confirming intent to comply with NAD

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on HBW Insight for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Marketing & Advertising

More from Business