Target Corp.'s ‘Clean’ Marketing Challenged In Consumer Class Action

The mega-retailer is defending a proposed class action in Minnesota federal court over its ‘Target Clean’ marketing and label, which it has awarded "independently" to around 4,000 products in its stores. Consumer plaintiffs allege some offerings contain ingredients on the program's “formulated without” list, as well as other hazardous substances that ought not be in clean products. Pending litigation against Sephora stands to be influential.

(Shutterstock)

Target Corporation falsely and misleadingly overuses its “Target Clean” label on cosmetics and other products in its stores in a move to capitalize on consumer demand and willingness to pay for authentically clean products, consumer plaintiffs allege in a putative US class action.

Filed on 29 August by Pearlie Boyd and 13 other plaintiffs in the US District Court for the District of Minnesota, the suit submits that “Target created and utilized...

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on HBW Insight for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Marketing & Advertising

Green Guides Update, FTC Enforcement In ‘Deregulatory’ Environment – BBB National Programs’ Engle During IBA Conference

 

The FTC’s Green Guides proposed update was expected by the end of the Biden Administration and there’s no indication it will be unveiled soon, says Mary Engle, BBB National Programs Exec VP, Policy. She also discussed the importance of industry self-regulation of artificial intelligence.

‘Made In The USA’ Claims May Be Popular In Time Of Tariffs, But Mistakes Are Costly – NAD

 

The National Advertising Division expects cases involving ‘Made in the USA’ claims to increase given US tariffs, says NAD VP Phyllis Marcus. The topic was also addressed by BBB National Programs’ Mary Engle during IBA’s Cosmetics Convergence Virtual Spring Conference 14-15 May.

NAD Refers Men’s Hair Color Brand To FTC For Non-Compliance With Fast-Track SWIFT Decision

 

Plano, Texas-based Simpler Hair Color Inc. may face FTC enforcement action after it failed to comply with the National Advertising Division’s recommendations it discontinue the claim, “Rated #1 Men’s Hair Color,” associated with a consumer review website.

NAD Under New Head Marcus Targets ‘AI Washing,’ Ads For Children

 

The National Advertising Division will pursue advertising that boasts the benefits of artificial intelligence before those benefits are actually achieved, says new NAD head Phyllis Hurwitz Marcus in an interview.

More from Business

Green Guides Update, FTC Enforcement In ‘Deregulatory’ Environment – BBB National Programs’ Engle During IBA Conference

 

The FTC’s Green Guides proposed update was expected by the end of the Biden Administration and there’s no indication it will be unveiled soon, says Mary Engle, BBB National Programs Exec VP, Policy. She also discussed the importance of industry self-regulation of artificial intelligence.

‘Made In The USA’ Claims May Be Popular In Time Of Tariffs, But Mistakes Are Costly – NAD

 

The National Advertising Division expects cases involving ‘Made in the USA’ claims to increase given US tariffs, says NAD VP Phyllis Marcus. The topic was also addressed by BBB National Programs’ Mary Engle during IBA’s Cosmetics Convergence Virtual Spring Conference 14-15 May.

Beauty Industry Not Taking Advantage Of CBP’s Duty Drawback – IBA Conference

 

US Customs and Border Protection’s program allowing companies to recoup fees for imported goods that were destroyed or exported is applicable in the case of most of President Trump’s reciprocal tariffs. However, most cosmetic companies don’t make use of it.